DroneBase provides unmanned drone services (e.g., aerial surveillance and mapping) nationwide. Tamanaha, a minority owner of DroneBase, claimed his ownership share had been improperly diluted in early financing by the company. A key issue was the value of the company as of May 2019. Plaintiff’s valuation expert used the market approach to conclude the value of DroneBase was $139 million. Neches used the income approach to conclude the value of DroneBase was $20.3 million. Result: the Arbitrator rejected Plaintiff’s valuation and found the testimony of Mr. Neches testified an expert in United States Bankruptcy Court, District of Nevada in this bankruptcy matter on behalf of a creditor regarding how much the debtor owed on a note issued by the creditor. The key issue was whether certain transactions among the loan funders should be considered as payback of principal, reducing the loan balance, or as substitutions of lenders, maintaining the prior loan balance.
Neches testified that a substitution of lenders was shown by the time proximity between the repayment of principal to one individual lender and the receipt of additional loan proceeds from another individual lender. Neches’ conclusion and calculation of the resulting loan balance. On appeal, the United States District Court for the District of Nevada affirmed the Judgment. The new construction consisted of 2 subterranean levels of parking, reaching an average excavation of 32 ft with a shoring area of 45,334 SF. stretching half a block from Hellman ave. Neches testified as an expert in United States District Court, Central District of California on behalf of plaintiff in this patent infringement case. The all new Courtyard Marriott hotel in Monterey Park was constructed right across from the AMC Atlantic Times Square 14 on Atlantic Blvd.
Linco sold online photo studio products, mostly in kits, that incorporated as a component a lamp holder protected by a design patent assigned to Linco. Top Lighting sold competing kits containing a light holder Linco claimed infringed its patented product.
#Calex engineering trial#
Neches’ analysis and trial testimony were his calculations of Linco’s lost kit sales and the portion of Linco’s lost profit attributable to the infringed lamp holder. Result: the jury found Linco’s patent was valid and willfully infringed, and they awarded lost profit of $138,363 – the exact amount to which Mr. Neches testified as an expert in AAA arbitration on behalf of defendant in this breach of contract and fraud case. The business type is Excavation Contractors (1997 NAICS). The business address is 23651 Pine Street, Newhall, CA 91321-3106.
#Calex engineering registration#
Search other Excavating Contractor in or near. Calex Engineering Co is a business registered for a Business Tax Registration Certificate with City of Los Angeles, Office of Finance. IAG and NPC, investment companies, had numerous inter-company transactions. Get coupons, hours, photos, videos, directions for Calex Engineering Co at 23651 Pine St Santa Clarita CA.
IAG claimed it had lost approximately $7 million more than it had invested through NPC. Universal Electrical Encasement Engineering and Estimating.Neches was retained to determine whether IAG had invested more in NPC than it received back, and if so, how much. Dismantling 22-Story Amusement Park Ride Deconstruction and Removal of Space Frame
0 kommentar(er)
